“Roll over, Machiavelli!”
Orthocracy Speaks
A Layman’s Guide to the Ruling System
copyright © 2011 by George B. Trinkaus. All rights reserved
First posted on WordPress in September, 2009, reconstructed and extended by a chapter January 2011, this is a blog on its way to a book. As a (copyrighted) manuscript in progress, there may be revisions throughout as new chapters are added. Also posted on the author’s website, TeslaPress.
Preface
Are we governed by a philosophy of rule that goes unperceived and unspoken? Is there a hidden technology of rule?
I contend that the real rules of rule are unutterable, and that one of those rules itself (Rule 12) dictates that they be forever unutterable.
Although no well organized orthocracy allows the rules of rule be made explicit, one can infer the outlines of a system of rules behind the veil, a ruling system. One can make such inferences from direct experience (sometimes painful), from direct observation, or from meditation on the daily news.
In this inquiry, any formal academic education (including political science, history, and sociology) can only be an impediment to insight. You’ll find none of this information in the illusory world of Poly-Sci 101.
Orthocracy Speaks is about the what of the system, not the who of it. (That has been done by May Brussels, David Emory, Gary Allen, Jim Marrs, David Ikes, Alex Jones … thank you all.) When a proper name appears here it is symbolic or iconic.
In my analysis I count thirteen rules of rule. They are stated below, and they will be restated at regular intervals. Do they ring a bell?
On consideration, you may posit more, or maybe fewer rules. I offer some suggestive evidence to support my analysis. You may think of some even more telling manifestations of the ruling system in action. Once one launches into such an inquiry, supporting evidence seems to be everywhere and inexhaustible. Here are the rules, as channeled to me by Orthocracy himself:
___________________________________________________
The 13 Rules of Rule
1. Keep them weak.
2. Keep them dumb.
3. Keep them scared.
4. Control all their resources.
5. Divide them, conquer them.
6. Control their rhythm and pace.
7. Control their chemistry.
8. Control their sex.
9. Jack them around.
10. Use coercion routinely, brute force when necessary.
11. Use deception routinely.
12. None of this can show.
13. This is The System; there shall be no other.
“orthocracy?”
We speak of the ruling system or the system, but the word system is vague. Merriam’s 3rd lists thirteen definitions. I offer instead the coinage orthocracy, meaning, from the Greek, straight-rule. Think of the colloquial connotations of straight, orthodox, uptight. (You won’t find this neologism in Merriam’s or Wikapedia, but orthocracy is not absolutely my own coinage; I heard it “in the streets” a few times back in the 1970′s, when it may have had some currency in the language.
As to the historical genesis of the orthocracy, I do not know, but you are welcome to speculate. Is it solely the work of man? Was it created by historical happenstance? Or did it descend by some agency from Jupiter or Mars? I do not know. The orthocracy does seem so alien. Perhaps the orthocracy came straight from Hell. Perhaps this hellish system is a necessary condition of human existence on this earthly plane, which may have a purgatorial purpose.
This book is Orthocracy’s confession. What you make of the esoteric knowledge in this confession is up to you. Some may make this guide a premise for anarchy or a manifesto for social revolution.
The shrewd may make of it a manual for success.
When I was a clueless college sophomore …
The original post received seven very encouraging comments which were lost in the restructuring, unfortunately, except for the first which somehow got saved and is copied here:
5/12/2009
from Anti-orthocrat
Wow, this is remarkably insightful writing. I have been thinking very much this way for a number of years, and knowing the kind of life I’ve lived up to this point (my mid thirties) as a result, I can hardly imagine what you’ve been through if you’ve been thinking this way for decades.
Please do continue this project. As I’m sure you fully realize, the audience will be necessarily small, because people ready and willing to hear all this are few and far between. Because of this, those of us who think this way have very little to draw upon outside ourselves. The typical “anarchist” websites and similar resources are of course almost always useless. As you suggest, these are just harmless and toothless avenues of expression allowed by the “orthocracy.” Their primary purpose is to channel opposition into dead ends and to allow it to discredit itself in various ways.
I’m looking forward to more of this work. It’s very rare that I get excited about reading anyone these days, because just about everybody is caught up in some kind of society-inculcated fantasy world of one kind or another, the vast majority of “non-conformists” included. Your work so far has been an oasis.
Damn right! Rebel proud! (Those are some of Hank Williams III’s words that I originally posted on here last year that got erased and lost from the original Orthocracy Speaks reply function.)
Some words that I’d like to add:
I believe that the electromagnetic spectrum needs more anarchy! Life would be much more entertaining if the radio spectrum had more anarchy and likewise: talent; instead of the Fascist Bureauocracy that it has become which is very talentless and boring to most of our ears, except for the political drone slaves (aka: Lemmings) who enjoy listening to the endless mainstream media crap!
Another thing – Some of us would like to have absolute control over our lives, our dreams, and our destinies! The Orthocratic dictatorship of the Matrix doesn’t allow everyone of us to have absolute control over our lives, our dreams, and our destinies! What do we do if we have no outlets to express ourselves and to be wild and free?
I operated a ‘pirate’ radio station back in 2000 and 2001 on a 24/7 basis, but the dictators sent their technopuppets to shut me down… I am also a radio amateur technician and got bored with ‘Ham’ (Amateur) radio, and got bored with C.B. (Citizens Band) radio as well. That is the reason why I did my ‘pirate’
low power broadcast radio station. I would have gone the legal route of doing my broadcast radio station, but there was just too much red tape to be successful in mainstream media so I went my own way, thus providing an alternative to mainstream broadcast radio, and the big radio stations didn’t like me as a competitor because of my creativity, so they successfully put me as the little man out of business by threatening to fine and/or imprison me because of my lack of money.
Thank you, Clyde.
The spectrum managers get little resistance in the radio department.
The low-power FM “movement” wants respectability, and it petitions, unlike the CB-ers, who just turned on their transceivers en masse, unlicensed, and won their right to transmit by doing the obvious direct action.
My “Enhancing the Ramsey AM-25″ on Teslapress is getting lots of readers.